who the devil drew it

A few things this week:

1) I couldn't decide whether to do a post about Gene Colan, who just died recently. As I said on Facebook:

One of the great comic book artists. Underrated, but absolutely distinctive. He drew a million books over several decades, but I remember him best for a long run on a very good book called Tomb of Dracula, a book called Night Force that I really liked but apparently nobody else did, and, of course, Howard the Duck with Steve Gerber (hence the "Wauuggghh!" in my original comment).

Audry Taylor said: Tomb of Dracula! Wasn't that written by Marv Wolfman?

Yes, as was Night Force. They worked very well together, along with Colan's best inker, Tom Palmer. Their long run on Tomb of Dracula was the best of that era (IMHO), along with Doug Moench and Paul Gulacy on Master of Kung Fu.

What decided me to post about Colan here was that I discovered the wonderful cover gallery on this site: www.genecolan.com. Just click on any of the covers as they go past and you can see it larger.

Howard Hawks said, when being interviewed by Peter Bogdanovich, "I liked almost anybody that made you realize who in the devil was making the picture." (That's where Bogdanovich got the title for his book, Who the Devil Made It.)

You could always spot Gene Colan's art right away. He wasn't considered hip and cool back in the old days, but I always liked him and he told a really good story. He could draw any kind of book, but his best work was probably on non-superhero titles like Tomb of Dracula and Night Force. He was also one of the all-time great Daredevil artists. He was best on down-to-earth titles, not the cosmic stories that were also popular then. But he was a pro, and he could do whatever type of book he was given.

And you could always tell who the devil drew it.


2) I've written before about Dave Sim, but something else just occurred to me. I was thinking about how bored I'd get editing an entire draft of a novel at once, as opposed to the way I've done it in the past. What I've always done is draft a chapter, edit it several times, proof it, and then post it. Then I go to the next chapter.

I just remembered reading an interview with Dave Sim, back when he was doing Cerebus, and he said that he did the book in a very unusual way. He laid out the first page, then he penciled it, lettered it, inked it, applied Zip-A-Tone, etc. Then, when it was done, he'd move on to page two.

Nobody else does this, as far as I know. Obviously, in some cases those stages are done by different people, but even if not the artist usually lays out the entire issue, then pencils it, and so on. For one thing, you want to make sure it ends up working correctly for the number of pages. But Sim said he would get bored doing nothing but penciling, penciling, penciling without a break. That makes sense to me.

Of course, the general opinion on Dave Sim is that he's crazy...


3) I will be rewriting my third novel, the first draft of which was finished almost four years ago. I will make one pass through the whole thing first, to think about the couple of areas I've already identified that need work. Then I imagine I'll work on the first chapter until I'm happy with it and then I'll post it before I move on. I think that's just the way I work. And I take some comfort from the fact that Dave Sim produced a 3,000-page graphic novel this way over 27 years. So, there must be something to it.


4) One thing I've discovered on writing blogs is that pretty much everybody other than me is aware of word counts. I knew A Sane Woman was around 45,000 words because it is an actual book, but I had no idea about U-town. I was curious, though so I used one of those websites that counts the words in your web pages and it comes out to around 170,715 words. Which is quite a lot.

The new book will not be anywhere near that long. I'm almost certain of that.


5) Before I begin work on the rewrite of the novel, I will of course finish "The Mystery of the Quiet People." That should be done by next weekend. It's all written, except for a possible epilogue, but the story is so complex that I need to print it out and read it through again carefully to make sure it all works.

image_pdfimage_print

7 thoughts on “who the devil drew it

  1. Wait, do you post as you write? Or do you write a complete draft then post as you edit? From your comments, I assumed the former, but point three of this post indicates the latter.

  2. Wow, that was a fast response. Do you have a little bell that goes off when I post? 🙂

    I generally post as I write (with enough delay to edit and proof and so on, that’s why the ending of the current mystery isn’t posted yet — it still needs another review).

    So, when I do the first pass through the WIP, that will be off-line. I will be making changes that will run throughout, since (one one hand) I will be removing unnecessary exposition, and also I want to consider the antagonist problem. I’m considering moving the antagonist from book #4 (who is a pip) forward into this book, but that will take some arranging.

    Once that’s done, I will probably start at the beginning again and then I will start posting as I go.

    That’s the plan now, but it’s subject to change, of course.

    (Oh, and I should explain that Draft #1, the one I’ll be revising, was online for the last 3+ years, and is only offline now due to PHP problems that I didn’t bother to fix since it’s all going to be rewritten anyway.)

  3. I have noticed what you did, Anthony. We’re all obsessed with the word count! Ha! I’m just doing it as a way to keep up with how much I’m writing a day in order to feel like I’m accomplishing something.

    My novel revision is up to 84,234 words so far. That’s pretty good for me actually. My first novel ended up being around 90,000 total. So, yeah, 170, 715 is quite an amazing length! Good luck with your edit and rewrite. (Which is almost the same thing I assume. 😉 )

  4. You’re a brave man, Anthony. I spend publication days under my bed, spooning my pages and a bottle of tequila. How do you let go so easily?

    I want some of that mojo.

  5. Emerald: I’m thinking of adding a WordPress plugin that allows me to see word counts, just out of curiosity. I’m not worried so much about making sure I’m writing enough, I’m more worried about making sure I don’t write another 170,000-word novel. Less is more, I think.

    Averil: I don’t think it’s mojo, I think it’s two things. One is keeping in mind what Andy Warhol said (the second quote here, about risks: http://u-town.com/collins/?p=200). I find that attitude really helpful.

    The other is that there’s a benefit to the pressure of imminent publcation, as I talked about here: http://u-town.com/collins/?p=156.

  6. I’m not sure I agree with Warhol, though the comparisons are reassuring. Only the individual himself can assess what kind of chance he’s taking, how far he’s reaching, what it might feel like to fail. The risk is internal, but there all the same.

  7. True. I think what’s always in the back of my mind is my experience (years ago) of being a musician.

    IMHO, there’s nothing that can happen to you as as writer that’s in the same class as a really bad gig in front of a live audience: songs going wrong, musicians forgetting cues, musicians too drunk, audience losing interest or walking out, equipment breaking, etc.

    That can, at this point, be a reassuring thought.

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.